|
REVITALIZATION
OPPORTUNITIES MATRIX
SOUTH SILVER SPRING REVITALIZATION STRATEGY |
||||||||
|
GOAL
|
SUGGESTED
ACTION PLAN
|
|||||||
| STRATEGY | Maintain Public Space & Infrastructure |
Re-Use Existing Buildings | Encourage Private Dev't or Spin-offs | Job Creation | Time-frame/Market Opportunities | Critical
Early-on Steps |
Implementing Agency | Public Funding or Incentives |
|
I. CREATE NEW PUBLIC-PRIVATE ENTITY: The South Silver Spring Revitalization Partnership Goal: Montgomery County should create a new public-private entity that can complement and go beyond existing revitalization programs to undertake marketing and tenant recruitment strategies and to serve as a coordinator between existing County revitalization programs & agencies with the sole focus on So. Silver Spring. |
Indirect; Goal addressed by primary re-sponsibility contuing with SSUD; SSRP to serve as liaison to establish priority sites/developers to receive funding from existing programs (e.g., DHCA facade & streetscape improvements) | Yes; Potentially a primary focus for SSRP staff | Yes; Through business recruitment, assistance & data collection & monitoring | Indirect; Monitor & document jobs created through SSRP efforts | Short-term (over next 6 to 9 months) |
Define organizational structure; hire executive director; recruit Board members from public & private sectors, & citizens; establish membership structure
|
Joint effort between DHCA; SSRO; County Executive with citizen input |
3 to 5 year funding commitment from County; solicit private membership contributions; Could allocate all/some of SSUD special assessment from study area to SSRP; Possible incentives include: site assembly (land write-downs); lowcost financing; property tax abatements; expedited review & approval process; special zoning considerations; site preparation & enhancements |
| Short-term & ongoing | Draft mission statement: identify goals & responsibilities, determine which existing public incentives should be continued; examine possible new incentives | SSRP with other agency input to ensure clear communications & avoid overlap with existing SSUD & SSRO duties | ||||||
| Alternative: Expand Urban District's Program Responsibilities | Short-term & ongoing | Coordinate capital improvements, amenities & maintenance with SSUD | SSRP; SSUD | |||||
|
II. UNDERTAKE MARKETING CAMPAIGN Goal: To attract business & professional services companies to create an employment center for industries that provide value-added, intermediate-level services to other companies in the region. Designed to take advantage of the study area's strong locational factors: relatively low occupancy costs; excellent transportation access; proximity to labor pool; existing building stock, etc. |
Market & promote capital improvements by SSUD & DHCA May need to market an urban design solution to buffer adjacent residential properties (e.g., Eastern Avenue, D.C.) |
Yes; Strategy can link potential tenants/owners with appropriate candidate bldgs. Strategy is consistent with existing zoning densites (FAR) |
Achieving this goal will be contingent on establishing "critical mass"; initial spin-offs may include food service (e.g, deli, carry-outs, other fast food) | Market available state tax incentives for job creation | Short-term (over next 12 to 16 months) | Inventory existing space & identify candidate bldgs. |
DHCA |
DHCA funded |
| Oportunities to target up to 50 business & service categories (click here to see list) | Attend trade shows to identify & market targeted businesses & candidate industries | SSRP; SSRO | SSRP & SSRO operating budgets | |||||
| Ongoing & Long-term (beyond 3 yrs.) to focus on unaddressed issues | Work w/property owners to evaluate bldg. conditions of appropriate target bldgs.; property owners to prepare renovation plans after tenants are secured | SSRP; DHCA for publicly-funded improvements | DHCA facade improvements; State Action Loans for Targeted Areas ("SALT"); NBDP funding for low-interest tenant improvement loans | |||||
| Ongoing | Promote available incentives from state & local sources for business recruitment, expansion or relocation efforts | SSRP with various agencies to serve as liaisons to State during tenant application process | Various programs offered by MD Industrial Dev't Finance Authority; MD Small Business Dev't Financing Authority | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
III. ADDRESS VACANT BUILDINGS Goal: To define re-use or disposition strategies for designated vacant buildings in South Silver Spring and to establish a schedule. |
Target key locations for public improvements and identify infrastructure assets and liabilities (e.g., sewer capacity, fiberoptics, micro-wave tower, etc.) | Determine reuse and/or dispositon strategy and any regulatory controls or incentives required | Achieving this goal would strengthen the competitive position of the study area | Achieving this goal relies on finding new uses for vacant bldgs. | Over 6 months | Explore establishing minimum performacne & appearance standards for vacant buildings | SSRP & various County agencies; County Council & Executive approval required | N/A |
| Short-term & ongoing | Evakyate unoacts if tax abatements for selected properties | Same as above | Potential loss of property tax revenues for disignated locations | |||||
| Short-term & ongoing | Provide link between property owners & tenant recruitment prospects | SSRP; SSRO | Staff funding support | |||||
| Short-term | Evaluate impacts of "grandfather clause" to Zoning Code that maintains existing zoned densities if bldgs. are demolished & redeveloped | SSRP & various County agencies; County Council & Executive approval required | Estimate "value" of retained zoned density | |||||
| Same as above | Evaluate creation of "TDR" program to transfer bonus or zoned densities to more marketable sites | |||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
IV. ATTRACT "Big Box" OR "Category Killer" RETAILER(S) Goal: To build upon the destinational quality of Caldor and strengthen the study area's competitive regional position by attracting similar or complementary retailers. Reinforces public investment instructured parking. Attract 1 to 3 tenants of 55,000 to 65,000 sq. ft. based on market demand. |
Reinforces public investment in parking garage adjacent to Caldor by potentially drawing vehicular traffic from outside study area | Limited; will likely require clean" site | Not likely in short-term for small-scale retail; longer-term opportunities will be determined by "Critical mass" & tenant types | Security of net gain in jobs is affected by duration of "Big Box" or "category killer' trend |
Short-term & ongoing
|
Identify candidate sites | SSRP with DHCA & SSRO input | Determine available incentives |
|
Short-term & ongoing
|
Recruit candidate tenants | SSRP | Determine available incentives | |||||
|
Short-term |
Evaluate impacts on parking district revenues | SSRP with SSPD | Possible parking subsidy in County garage adjacent to Caldor | |||||
| Ongoing | Negotiate and structure public participation in the deal | SSRP with various County agencies; County Council & Executive approval required | To be determined for specific sites and tenants | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
V. TO RETAIN MONTGOMERY COLLEGE IN SOUTH SILVER SPRING AREA Short-Term Goal: Expand the existing campus to accommodate current 70,000 sq. ft. of space requirements to one or more selected sites, including those identified in the Concept Plan study on Georgia Avenue. Long-Term Goal: To consider relocation of the entire campus into the study area. |
Capitalizes on existing infrastructure by maintaining use of existing Fenton Street parking garage; Create a more pedestrian-friendly environment | Explore potential to re-use existing vacant bldgs. in the study area | Develop spinoff retail & food service (e.g., food & beverage, copies & supplies) opportunities | Job Training partnerships between area employers & College; link to other nearby "anchors": NIH; Walter Reed; NOAA; Holy Cross Hospital |
Timeframe to be determined by availablility of state funding for expansion/relocation Current program requires 70,000 sq. ft. of additional space |
Identify candidate sites for acquisition
|
M-NCPPC; SSUD; SSRP; College
|
Staff funding
|
|
Evaluate costs & benefits of relocating College vs. redevelopment/expansion of current site |
County Dept. of Finance & Revenue; College; SSRP | Potential "Public" purchase of private parcels by eminent domain; relocation costs | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
VI. REVISE ZONING CODE FOR SOUTH SILVER SPRING Goal: To strengthen zoning as a development tool for revitalization. |
N/A
|
May result in demolition of selected bldgs. | Potential dictated by market conditions | Potential for net gain in employment | Short-term (over next 12 to18 months) | Amend Zoning Code to up zone specific sites from current FAR of 0.5x |
Review by various County agencies with County Council & Executive approval |
None required |
| Could result inpublic spaceamenities in ex-change for den-sity bonuses | May result indemolition ofselected bldgs. | Same as above | Potential dictated by market conditions | Short-term(over next 12 to18 months) | Amend Zoning Code to create "TDR" program in which dev't rights and trips generated are transferred to more marketable sites | Same as above | Potential staff costs for program management | |
|
Abbreviations: |
||||||||
| SOURCE: ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, SEPTEMBER 1996. | ||||||||